Cases 81 - 90 of 398
Weitzman v. Twitter, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
Casey Weitzman
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Analysis Group, Inc. v. Twitter Inc.
as 1:2023cv10312
Plaintiff:
Analysis Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Twitter Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
v. In Re DMCA Subpoena to Twitter, Inc.
as 3:2023mc80034
In Re:
In Re DMCA Subpoena to Twitter, Inc.
Petitioner:
Cognosphere Pte. Ltd.
Not Classified By Court:
Twitter, Inc.
In Re DMCA Subpoena to Twitter, Inc.
as 3:2023mc80035
In Re:
In Re DMCA Subpoena to Twitter, Inc.
Petitioner:
Cognosphere Pte. Ltd.
Not Classified By Court:
Twitter, Inc.
v. In Re DMCA Subpoena to Twitter, Inc.
as 4:2023mc80033
In Re:
In Re DMCA Subpoena to Twitter, Inc.
Petitioner:
Cognosphere Pte. Ltd.
Not Classified By Court:
Twitter, Inc.
INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH ONE ACCOUNT STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY TWITTER, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 2703 AND 3512
as 1:2023ml00179
In Re:
INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH ONE ACCOUNT STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY TWITTER, INC. PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 2703 AND 3512
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Darnell Hicks v. Floyd Bradford, III, et al
as 23-55059
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DARNELL HICKS
Defendant / Appellant:
FLOYD S. BRADFORD III
Defendant:
ELIZABETH STRUMP, IAN MILES CHEONG, LAKEWOOD CA REGIONAL CRIME AWARENESS, PREVENTION AND SAFETY GROUP and others
Gerber v. Twitter, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gerber and Eric Cohen
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ashton-Cirillo v. Twitter, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ashton-Cirillo
Defendant:
Twitter Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BackGrid USA, Inc. v. DOES 1-10 et al
as 2:2022cv09461
Plaintiff:
BackGrid USA, Inc.
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
