Cases 81 - 90 of 2,230
Manning v. USA et al
as 4:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Reco D Manning
Defendant:
USA and Eastern District of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welsh v. USA et al
as 4:2023cv00712
Defendant:
Meta, USA, Ghan & Cooper Commercial Properties and others
Plaintiff:
Quizel Welsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Rexel USA Inc v. JDI Integrations, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Rexel USA Inc
Defendant:
JDI Integrations, LLC and Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Brown El v. USA
as 4:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Ashley Brown El and Ashley Branch
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. USA
as 6:2023cv06087
Petitioner:
Redmon Logan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hunter v. Santander Consumer USA
as 4:2023cv00662
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Hunter
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Morris v. USA
as 6:2023cv06085
Petitioner:
Randall Morris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gibson v. Consumer Testing Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv05118
Defendant:
Robert Burgess doing business as Burgess Group also known as BOB BURGESS AND ASSOCIATES, Consumer Testing Laboratories, Inc., UL VERIFICATION SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Alexis Leah Freeman Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Sanderson v. USA
as 4:2023cv00651
Petitioner:
Christopher Sanderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hickey v. USA
as 4:2023cv00644
Plaintiff:
David Hickey
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
