Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 81 - 90 of 3,991
Doe #044 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff: John Doe #044
Defendant: William - Lee, David B. Rausch and William Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe #043 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff: John Doe #043
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe #045 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00016
Plaintiff: John Doe #045
Defendant: William Lee, David Rausch and Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #042 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff: John Doe #042
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Wooden v. Lee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01052
Plaintiff: John H. Wooden and Jabari I. Mandela
Defendant: William Lee, David Raush, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00275
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe #1 (EDB) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00266
Plaintiff: John Doe #1 (EDB) and John Doe #2 (WEB)
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00265
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. Aramark et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff: Robert E. Williams, Corey D. Lurry and Jamal Moore
Defendant: Aramark, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?