Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 81 - 90 of 112,136
DALE et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2024cv00818
Plaintiff: KEYON DALE and LAMONTAY AYERS
Defendant: CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00817
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BRENTON v. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff: JOSHUA MICHAEL BRENTON
Defendant: QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glassel v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff: Christopher J Glassel
Defendant: Ron Neal, Raccio and Sherri Fritter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00828
Petitioner: DAQUWON RICHARDSON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PHILLIPS v. JACKSON et al
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff: JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant: JACKSON, NALL, K. PADGETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CELLA v. LILLY USA LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00814
Plaintiff: DANIEL CELLA
Defendant: LILLY USA LLC and THE LILLY SEVERANCE PAYMENT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00812
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LOPEZ v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00176
Plaintiff: MARTIN LOPEZ
Defendant: CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CASEY JACOBS-CAMPBELL and MIKAYLA WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COATES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv00813
Plaintiff: TRACEY COATES
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?