Civil Rights Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 70,772
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02275
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Doe v. Mapleton Local School District et al.
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Mapleton Local School District, Mapleton Local School District Board of Education, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00528
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Dowlen v. The City of Springfield, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00522
Plaintiff: Kierra Lachelle Dowlen
Defendant: The City of Springfield, Tennessee and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00526
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Randleman v. Firelands Habitat for Humanity, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00760
Plaintiff: Tonya L. Randleman
Defendant: Firelands Habitat for Humanity, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3353
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miles v. Wayne County Treasurer et al
as 2:2024cv11125
Plaintiff: Charles Miles
Defendant: Wayne County Treasurer and Detroit Treasurer Office

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?