Cases 81 - 90 of 8,749
Murphy v. Officer Kopps(Inmate 1)
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lee Murphy
Defendant:
Officer Kopps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sales v. Butler et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Jerette Sales
Defendant:
Pamela Butler, Sgt. Walker, Ms. Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macon v. Garner et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
James Isiah Macon
Defendant:
Sergeant Garner, Medical Staff and YesCare Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelayo v. Keyes (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Glenn Bonilla Pelayo
Defendant:
R. D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Johnson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell, Rick Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gholston v. Crabtree (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gholston
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ritter v. Ogletree et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Brian Henry Ritter
Defendant:
Sgt. Ogletree, Jay Jones, Officer Snipes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerido v. Henline et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Antonio Orlander Jerido
Defendant:
Mike Henline, Ranier Daramus, James Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Calloway (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Silas Martin
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture
Newby v. Grantham et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ricardo Newby
Defendant:
Madison Grantham, Mary B. Roberson and Steven T. Speakman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
