Cases 81 - 90 of 30,902
United States of America v. $34,500.00 in United States Currency
as 2:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
$34,500.00 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Peavley v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois et al
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
James Mark Peavley
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois and United Financial Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Sutton v. USA
as 2:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Randall Sutton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Parker v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Amanda R. Parker
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Zelesnik v. Mayor Aftab Pureval et al
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
Mayor Aftab Pureval, Teresa Theetge, Roxanne Qualls and others
Zelesnik v. President Joe Biden et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Defendant:
President Joe Biden, Congressman Massie, Judge Hopkins and others
Robertson v. David Paul
as 5:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Demetrius M. Robertson
Respondent:
David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goff v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex
as 0:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Kamron Goff
Defendant:
Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keathley v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
as 7:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Phyllistine Keathley
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
