Cases 1 - 10 of 37,691
Mann+Hummel Filtration Technology US LLC et al v. Jasper Rubber Products, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Mann+Hummel Filtration Technology US LLC and Mann+Hummel Purolator Filters LLC
Defendant:
Jasper Rubber Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pacheco v. Love et al
as 5:2024ct03125
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Skyler Love, Deputy Greene, Graylan Groce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Woodard v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024ct03126
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Woodard
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden L.B. Kelly, Safety Supervisor Muscle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Richardson v. Social Security
as 5:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Lance Salvas Richardson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Douse v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
James Nathaniel Douse
Defendant:
United States of America and Greylock McKinnon Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Murdock Ready Mixed Concrete v. Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Murdock Ready Mixed Concrete
Defendant:
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc., RB Global Inc., Ritchie Brothers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyer v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Meyer, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
McDowell v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Omar McDowell
Defendant:
United States of America
Fowler v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Denise Fowler
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Brownell v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
David Brownell
Defendant:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
