Cases 11 - 20 of 102
Wharton v. St Joesph County Jail et al
as 3:2021cv00861
Plaintiff:
Peter Allen Wharton
Defendant:
St Joesph County Jail, St Joesph County Jail Dentist, N.P./Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02710
Plaintiff:
ALICE BUTLER
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FULK v. HERMAN FOOD AND GAS INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
ALICE N. FULK
Defendant:
HERMAN FOOD AND GAS INC. d/b/a QUICK PICK SOUTH, HARDEEP SINGH and HERMAN FOOD AND GAS INC. doing business as QUICK PICK SOUTH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Riles v. Wanda et al
as 3:2021cv00483
Defendant:
Alice, Wanda and Stephanie
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Riles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOWERS et al v. BELL et al
as 1:2021cv01812
Plaintiff:
JACOB ALLEN FLOWERS and ALICE MARIE FLOWERS
Defendant:
OLIVIA PRATT, JANE DOES TO BE NAMED, JOHN DOES TO BE NAMED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Lawson et al
as 3:2021cv00380
Plaintiff:
Teron Reid and Teron A Reid
Defendant:
Julie Lawson, U.S. Marshal Service, U.S. Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOWERS v. EQUIFAX, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv02586
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, EQUIFAX, INC. and EQUIFAX CONSUMER SERVICES
Plaintiff:
ALICE MARIE FLOWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOCHERT v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv01990
Plaintiff:
ALICE KOCHERT
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
GUTHRIE v. BLEVINS et al
as 1:2020cv01765
Respondent:
WASHINGTON COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, BRENT MILLER and ALICE BLEVINS
Petitioner:
ERIC WADE GUTHRIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thompson v. Lawson et al
as 3:2020cv00317
Defendant:
Alice, Platez, Lawson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
