Cases 31 - 40 of 1,541
CRAIG A. SHENK v. AMY L. GRIFFITHS
as 2:2024cv00957
Defendant:
AMY L. GRIFFITHS and AMY L. SHENK
Plaintiff:
CRAIG A. SHENK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1357
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1355
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1356
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Torres v. Tai et al
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Yadira Torres
Defendant:
Bill Tai, Mike Ho, Asher Genoot and others
Jordan v. Barves et al
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Charles Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
J. Barves, J. Pumphrey, Lt. Bardo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. A & E SOLHEIM, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00969
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
A & E SOLHEIM, LLC doing business as A&E AUTO GLASS, ERIC A. SOLHEIM, ANNA M. SOLHEIM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Tang et al v. CITIC Capital Holdings Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
JOHN YONG TANG and Faris Al Kooheji
Defendant:
CITIC CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD., CITIC Limited, CITIC Capital Partners LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
GNC Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Philadelphia v. Aisha Bradley, et al
as 24-1209
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
City of Philadelphia v. Aisha Bradley, et al
as 24-1210
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
