Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,355
Ackerman et al v. Arkema Inc.
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff: Dorothy Ackerman, Mary Ackerman, Sylbestre Aburto and others
Defendant: Arkema Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01351
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Anderson v. Day
as 2:2024cv00873
Plaintiff: Donald Arthur Anderson
Defendant: Travis Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sencial v. Coll et al
as 2:2024cv00874
Plaintiff: Steven Sencial
Defendant: Arthur Coll, A Galvez, S Reina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spicer v. Harris County et al
as 4:2024cv01170
Plaintiff: Elton Spicer
Defendant: Harris County, John Vickers, Andrew Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Port Arthur Pipeline L L C v. Lyons et al
as 2:2024cv00429
Plaintiff: Port Arthur Pipeline L L C
Defendant: Kenneth Paul Lyons, Helen Jean Schumacher Lyons, Robert Charles Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
USA v. Johnson
as 24-10231
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Arthur Johnson
Port Arthur Pipeline L L C v. Broussard et al
as 2:2024cv00379
Plaintiff: Port Arthur Pipeline L L C
Defendant: Jeremy Broussard, Patricia Ryan Cenac Estate, Shane Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Drake v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff: Eric Drake
Defendant: FedEx Ground Package System Inc, Molly Smith, Arthur William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?