Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sides v. Dollar Tree Stores Inc
as 6:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Connie J Sides
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Moore v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Connie Monique Moore
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Melton, Jr. v. Brooks (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Connie Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Houston Co. et al (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00583
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Houston Co., Town of Gordon, Bill Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Deaton et al v. Stephens et al
as 2:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
D Deaton, T Peake, J. K. D. and others
Defendant:
Patricia Stephens, Agnes Chappell, Alisha Ruffin May and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
South v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 4:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Kayla South
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, Kari Pearce, Christopher Pearce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
Connie Anderson
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Twanda Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
