Cases 31 - 40 of 671
Johnson v. Gagne et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Gerard G. Gagne, Daniel Yesu, Michelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tobey v. Brisson et al
as 3:2023cv00789
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Tobey
Defendant:
Robin Brisson, Bridget A Nordstrom, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. Correction et al
as 3:2023cv00731
Plaintiff:
Victor Lamond Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
Dept. of Correction, John Doe, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
Christopher Calhoun
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Freston, Laprey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fogarty v. Gordils et al
as 3:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Austin Fogarty
Defendant:
Gordils, Bleakus, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currytto v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00700
Plaintiff:
Kevin W. Currytto
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Angel Quiros, William Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
U.S. Bank National Association v. Bliss et al
as 3:2023cv00671
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Heather Bliss, Will Trudeau, John Doe and others
Lyons v. City of Hartford et al
as 3:2023cv00594
Plaintiff:
A. Bates Lyons
Defendant:
City of Hartford, Gamaliel Perez and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe et al v. Lyft Drives Connecticut, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Joan Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
Lyft Drives Connecticut, Inc. and Christopher Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doe et al v. Lyft Drives Connecticut, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Joan Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
Lyft Drives Connecticut, Inc. and Christopher Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
