Cases 21 - 30 of 52
WOODS v. MALANOSKI et al
as 2:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
JEROME CARLTON WOODS
Defendant:
MAUREEN MALANOSKI, CANDICE LACKEY, DAVID E. ZETWO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fatir v. Connections et al
as 1:2016cv00933
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Connections, Maureen Gay-Johnson, C.D. McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fatir v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00315
Plaintiff:
Amir Fatir
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Perry Phelps, Chris Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galindez v. Connections Medical Services et al
as 1:2015cv01084
Plaintiff:
Frankie Galindez
Defendant:
Connections Medical Services and Maureen Gay-Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PORCARO v. O'REILLY
as 3:2015cv04036
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN PORCARO
Defendant:
MAUREEN I. O'REILLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAYNE v. ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv02813
Plaintiff:
STEVEN PAYNE
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COUNTY OF ESSEX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEATH v. FOREST COUNTY et al
as 1:2013cv00280
Plaintiff:
JORDAN HEATH
Defendant:
FOREST COUNTY, MAUREEN A. SKERDA, P.J., COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIS v. THE CITY OF HARRISBURG, PA. et al
as 2:2013cv03397
Petitioner:
CRAIG ELLIS
Respondent:
THE CITY OF HARRISBURG, PA., JOHN AND JANE DOE, MARY ROSETTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NIBLACK v. DETECTIVE ANTHONY MURRAY et al
as 3:2012cv06910
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L. NIBLACK
Defendant:
DETECTIVE ANTHONY MURRAY, S.O. JUSTIN POBLETE, BOROUGH OF BRADLEY BEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COKE et al v. . et al
as 2:2012cv04680
Plaintiff:
LESTER COKE, JIM SHOWER POSSE BROWN, JR, LYNDELL KULLUM and others
Defendant:
KAREN ., BOB MAYER, VALERIE KROMAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
