Cases 31 - 40 of 130
Roszak v. United States Marshalls Services Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv01407
Defendant:
Robert Magnus, Martin Garcia, Paul Jones and others
Plaintiff:
April M. Roszak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collins et al v. Neil et al
as 1:2019cv08178
Plaintiff:
Joseph Latimer, Thomas Collins, Robin Rabens and others
Defendant:
Unknown Others, Non-Record Claimants, Michael Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shah El v. Josh et al
as 3:2019cv50123
Defendant:
Maureen Josh, Phillip Montgomery, Ronald Matekaits and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv08048
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", ChenJian Juan, Somefashion and others
Plaintiff:
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Gress v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv07423
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Maureen M. Gress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Olsson v. Jung-Oliver et al
as 1:2018cv07084
Defendant:
James Corcaran, Maureen Jung-Oliver, Illinois Inspector General and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Olsson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrigan v. Reckitt Benckiser LLC
as 1:2018cv07073
Plaintiff:
Maureen Carrigan
Defendant:
Reckitt Benckiser LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Olsson v. Malis et al
as 1:2018cv06838
Defendant:
Maureen Jung-Oliver, Brian Dawson, Richard Malis and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Olsson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
