Cases 31 - 40 of 282
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10747
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001
Hedger, et al v. Bar Harbor Trust Services
as 20-1423
Defendant / Appellee:
BAR HARBOR TRUST SERVICES, individually and in its capacities as Trustee of a Trust created under the Last Will and Testament of Frank Howard Hedger and a Trust under Trust Agreement by Nathalie C. Hedger
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS HEDGER, MATTHEW HEDGER, ADAM HEDGER and others
Murray v. Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc.
as 1:2019cv12608
Defendant:
Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc. DBA Hello Fresh, Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc. and Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc. doing business as Hello Fresh
Plaintiff:
Grace Murray, Amanda Engen, Stephen Bauer and others
Not Classified By Court:
Kari Hand Benton, Sarah McDonald and Keith Head
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cruz Millan, et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance, et al
as 19-2165
Plaintiff:
EFRAIN BURGOS LOPEZ, JONATHAN ZHENG, A.S.C., minor represented by Luis Carrion-Lopez and others
Interested Party:
MANUEL BATISTA-DE LA ROSA and SHIRLEY A. TEJADA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANCES T. SERRA MORALES, O.M.S., minor 3 represented by Orlando Morales and Quetcy Soler, G.C.L., minor 2 represented by Manuel Morales and Yadira Leon and others
Defendant:
MULTINATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, HF ENGINEERING CONSULTING GROUP, PSC, G2 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE and FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver for Doral Bank
Allstate Insurance Company v. Fougere, et al
as 19-2003
Defendant / Appellant:
A BETTER INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., a/k/a ABIA, SARAH BRODY-ISBILL and JAMES FOUGERE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO.
Lancaster et al v. Icon Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv00495
Plaintiff:
Denise Trlica, Rachel Bernstein, Hillary Fisher and others
Defendant:
Icon Corp. and E. Anthony Santurri
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Rosie D., et al v. Baker, et al
as 19-1767
Plaintiff:
CHELSEA T., KRISTIN H., CHRIS T. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANTON B., by his mother Lisa A., SHEENA M., by her mother Deborah D., DEVIN E., by his grandmother Barbara E. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL TSAI, Assistant Secretary for MassHealth, MARYLOU SUDDERS, Secretary of the Executive Office of Health and Human Services, CHARLES D. BAKER, Governor of Massachusetts and others
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE and ROBERT H. WEBER
Rosie D., et al v. Baker, et al
as 19-1262
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES D. BAKER, MICHAEL HEFFERNAN, Secretary of the Executive Office of Administration and Finance, DANIEL TSAI, in his Official Capacity as the Assistant Secretary for MassHealth and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TERRENCE M., ANTON B., by his mother Lisa A., SAMUEL L. and others
Defendant:
JANICE B., ERIC KRISS and EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Undetermined:
KRISTIN H.
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE and ROBERT H. WEBER
Gould, et al v. Morgan, et al
as 17-2202
Amicus Curiae:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE OF DELAWARE, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COMMONWEALTH SECOND AMENDMENT, INC., CHRISTOPHER HART, SARAH ZESCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL C. O'LEARY, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the Brookline Police Department, WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Boston Police Department, MARK MORGAN, Acting Chief of the Brookline Police Department and others
Petitioner:
ALAN B. MORRISON and JACK RAKOVE
Plaintiff:
IRWIN CRUZ and MARKUS VALLASTER
Defendant:
DAVID A. PROVENCHER, in his Official Capacity as Chief of the New Bedford Police Department
Oulton et al v. Hladick et al
as 1:2017cv11343
Plaintiff:
Sarah A Oulton
Defendant:
Carol B Hladick, Andrew Hladick, Nancy J Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
