Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Mitchell v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00660
Defendant:
FNU Curry, Alisha Tafoya, I. Jocodo and others
Plaintiff:
Stacy Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heide v. Kansas Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-3071
Defendant:
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF KANSAS, FNU CURRY and others
Plaintiff:
JAY STEVEN HEIDE
Ortiz et al v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Isaac J. Ortiz, Lawrence P. Rivas, Angelo Tinoco and others
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya, C Wilkins, I Jocobo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heide (ID 108654) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv03040
Plaintiff:
Jay Steven Heide
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Kansas, State of, Anthony Leon Bartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Batastini et al
as 6:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gray
Defendant:
Ashley B Batastini, FNU Madrano, FNU Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Taylor et al
as 5:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Isom Daniel Rogers, III
Defendant:
P D Taylor, Captain FNU Sedbrook, FNU Sedbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higginbotham v. Johnson et al
as 5:2021cv00587
Plaintiff:
Kevin Higginbotham
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU MacMiller and FNU Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01080
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Van Dyke v. Curry et al
as 1:2012cv00148
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant:
FNU Curry, Butner Regional Forsenic Administrator, James Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Dyke v. Butner Regional Forsenic Administrator et al
as 1:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant:
Butner Regional Forsenic Administrator, Charles Vance, James Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
