Cases 11 - 20 of 157,029
Mohamed v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv11195
Plaintiff:
Sadek Abdulhamid Mohamed
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carpenter v. King et al
as 1:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Carli Carpenter
Respondent:
Chris King, Kym Worthy, Patricia Penman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patton v. Frank et al
as 1:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Craig Andrew Patton #356869, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Frank, Unknown Shae, Unknown Vanwormer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spirdione #947841 v. Wood
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Alan Spirdione #947841
Defendant:
Rebecca Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamka v. Ramirez
as 2:2024cv11181
Plaintiff:
Mr. Khodr Hamka
Defendant:
Mr. Paul Wyatt Ramirez, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
United States of America v. Belle Tire Distributors, Inc.
as 2:2024cv11182
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Belle Tire Distributors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 U.S. Plaintiff
Martin-Landers LLC d/b/a Mark Martin Ford et al v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 2:2024cv11185
Plaintiff:
Martin-Landers LLC d/b/a Mark Martin Ford and Martin-Landers Imports LLC d/b/a Mark Martin Kia
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Compagnie Gnrale des tablissements and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Baugh v. Miller et al
as 2:2024cv11174
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
Joann Miller and The City of Detroit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Baugh v. The City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv11175
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Baugh
Defendant:
The City of Detroit, joann Miller and Wayne County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
