Cases 11 - 20 of 59,085
Jones v. Cardwell et al
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Treyshawn L. Jones
Defendant:
Andre Cardwell, Bradley Hansford, D. Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kight v. Burkette
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ann Kight
Defendant:
Duwayne Burkette
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514 Civil Action to Restrain Harassment of a Victim
Dinh v. Campbell et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Quoc Dinh
Defendant:
Julie Campbell, Christopher D. Hunt, Jason K. Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Williams v. City of Louisville et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Publlic Affairs, Human Resources Victims Right Services, Craig Greenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sigmon v. SSA
as 0:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Shade A. Sigmon
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Skees v. Peoples Bank
as 3:2024cv00292
Defendant:
Peoples Bank and Limestone Bank, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy Skees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Thompson v. Geddie
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Nikole Thompson
Defendant:
Karen Geddie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 mv Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00291
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Swift Roofing Inc. v. GL Housing Construction LLC
as 5:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Swift Roofing Inc.
Respondent:
GL Housing Construction LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Ashby v. Burgess
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Ashby
Defendant:
Meredith G. Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv Removal- Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
