Cases 31 - 40 of 267
Smith v. City of Montgomery, Alabama et al(MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Alabama, Sarah Foster, Morgan Library and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Cleburn County Courthouse et al
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Jason Omar Johnson
Defendant:
Cleburn County Courthouse and Calhoun County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chames v. Calhoun County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2021cv01571
Plaintiff:
Latonya Chames
Defendant:
Calhoun County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Reed v. Calhoun County Jail
as 1:2021cv01460
Plaintiff:
Kajuan Reed
Defendant:
Calhoun County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Calhoun v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01417
Plaintiff:
Eric Calhoun and Arletha Calhoun
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, Wells Fargo Bank N.A. and PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reynolds v. Calhoun, et al
as 1:2021cv00649
Plaintiff:
Cazeio Reynolds
Defendant:
Will Maddox, Travis Calhoun, Jonathan Elkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crutchfield v. Fleiner et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
Barney Crutchfield
Defendant:
Stacey Fleiner, D. Taylor, Kalvin Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Alabama, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00947
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Calhoun County, Cleburne County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Calhoun et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00405
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, A W E. Villareal, David Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Calhoun et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00364
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Sonya Thompson, CMC Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
