Cases 1 - 10 of 371
Abercombie et al v. Integon National Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Gregory Abercombie, Bryant Williams and Darius Calhoun
Defendant:
Integon National Insurance Company and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv05016
Plaintiff:
Kathy J. Calhoun and Kathy Jorita Calhoun
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bell v. Precythe, et al
as 6:2023cv03068
Plaintiff:
Johnell A Bell
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Michele Buckner, Conrad Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Adams
as 4:2022cv01184
Petitioner:
William Calhoun
Respondent:
David Vandergriff and Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calhoun v. Adams
as 4:2022cv01155
Petitioner:
William Calhoun
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stafford v. Precythe et al
as 6:2022cv03067
Plaintiff:
Cody Jo Stafford
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, J. Cofield, Michelle Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Kansas City Credit Union
as 4:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Sarah Calhoun, Sarah O Calhoun and Sara Calhoun
Defendant:
Kansas City Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Calhoun v. Kansas City Credit Union et al
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Sarah Calhoun
Defendant:
Kansas City Credit Union, Crystal Ammons, Stephanie Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
