Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Calhoun v. Smalls et al
as 6:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Joshua Calhoun
Defendant:
Officer FNU Smalls and OIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04046
Petitioner:
Joshua Calhoun
Defendant:
TDCJ Director
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webb v. S. Hunter et al
as 4:2023cv03975
Plaintiff:
Joerion Webb
Defendant:
S. Hunter, C.A. Brown and Lt. Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Director
as 6:2023cv00505
Petitioner:
Joshua Calhoun
Respondent:
TDCJ Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calhoun v. Director, TDC-CID
as 5:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
Joshua Calhoun
Respondent:
Director, TDC-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Degollado et al v. City of Port Lavaca, Texas et al
as 6:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Degollado, Daniel Herrera, Faded Smoke Shop LLC and others
Defendant:
City of Port Lavaca, Calhoun County, Texas, Collin Rangnow, Kyle Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mbata v. Garza, et al
as 1:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Chukwuemeka Mbata
Defendant:
Jose Garza, Clifford Brown, John S. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. C.D. Caldwell et al
as 4:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Edward James Calhoun
Defendant:
C.D. Caldwell, Bill Waybourn and C D Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yoon v. Garg et al
as 4:2022cv04089
Plaintiff:
Jung-Hoon Yoon
Defendant:
Nisha J. Garg, Carolee King, Daniel Sharphorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calhoun v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01185
Petitioner:
Dean Edward Calhoun
Respondent:
Warden FNU Delap, Ken Paxton and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
