Cases 1 - 10 of 227
LaClaire v. Warden SD Darin Young et al
as 5:2022cv05073
Petitioner:
Will C. LaClaire
Respondent:
Warden SD Darin Young, Bob Dooley and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neels v. Young et al
as 4:2022cv04053
Petitioner:
Ronald Lee Neels
Respondent:
Darin Young, Bob Dooley, Brenda Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gomez v. Dooley et al
as 4:2021cv04085
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Petitioner:
Daniel Jose Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harcey v. South Dakota Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 4:2021cv04071
Defendant:
Myron Rau, Kenneth Albers, Chuck Schroyer and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Harcey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Croymans et al
as 1:2021cv01007
Defendant:
Robert W. Dooley, Tim Zempel, City of Sisseton and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Sandoval Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Tripp v. Dooley et al
as 4:2021cv04027
Defendant:
Sandra Hanson, Darin Young, Matthew Thelen and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripp v. Young et al
as 4:2020cv04195
Defendant:
Warden Darin Young, Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg, Warden Bob Dooley and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripp v. Dooley et al
as 4:2020cv04177
Respondent:
Darin Young, Bob Dooley and Jason Ravnsborg
Petitioner:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tripp v. Dooley et al
as 4:2020cv04095
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota, Daren Young, Bob Dooley and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McPeek v. Meyers et al
as 4:2020cv04078
Defendant:
Warden Darin Young, Lt. Dykstra, Unkown Property Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Travis R. McPeek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
