Cases 11 - 20 of 138
ZACHARY v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv02164
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania and The District Attorney of The County of Dauphin County
Petitioner:
Heath Zachary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ZACHARY v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv05616
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DAUPHIN COUNTY
Petitioner:
HEATH ZACHARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Heath v. Superintendent
as 5:2020cv03722
Petitioner:
Anthony Darrell Heath
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARVEST v. BERNSTEIN et al
as 3:2020cv00013
Plaintiff:
WINSLOW ULYSSES HARVEST
Defendant:
JUDGE TAMMARA BERNSTEIN and HEATH LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GRAY v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv01414
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, ROBERT GILMORE and STEPHEN DURCO
Plaintiff:
HEATH W. GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Baptiste v. Morris et al
as 3:2018cv01484
Defendant:
Kathryn Morris, Heath, Marwin Reeves and others
Plaintiff:
Yonel Jean Baptiste
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HEATH v. LINK et al
as 2:2017cv04221
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HEATH
Defendant:
CYNTHIA LINK, J. LOZAR and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cain, et al v. Oddo, et al
as 3:2017cv01081
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cain, Richard Hugly and Mark Anthony Williams
Defendant:
L.J. Oddo, Heath, Feltman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heath Gray v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 17-1619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEATH GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYCOMING COUNTY
Defendant - Intervenor:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
McCarthy v. Heath et al
as 4:2017cv00468
Plaintiff:
John J. McCarthy
Defendant:
Sussanne Heath, Ebbert and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
