Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Chad Heath v. Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet
as 22-5849
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHAD ALAN HEATH
Defendant / Appellee:
KENTUCKY JUSTICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY CABINET
Heath v. Administrative Office of the Courts
as 3:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Chad-Alan: Heath
Defendant:
Administrative Office of the Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Chad Heath v. LaRue County, KY Sheriff's Office
as 22-5685
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHAD ALAN HEATH
Defendant / Appellee:
LARUE COUNTY, KY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Gregg v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (TV1)
as 1:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Heath L. Gregg
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Heath v. Larue County Sheriffs Office
as 3:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
Chad-Alan: Heath
Defendant:
Larue County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Heath v. Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet
as 3:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
Chad-Alan: Heath
Defendant:
Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 267
Shottenkirk v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01706
Plaintiff:
Heath Shottenkirk
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Heath et al v. Bland et al
as 2:2021cv02502
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Cedric Heath and Ruthie Heath
Defendant:
Willie D. Bland, Ricky Scott, Land Transportation Division of Evans Delivery Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heath v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01921
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nancy Heath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dukes et al v. McClay Transportation USA, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00144
Defendant:
McClay Transportation USA, LLC, Todd Bowling and Todd A. Bowling
Plaintiff:
Megan Dukes and HEATH JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
