Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Doe v. United States Probation Office of the Eastern District of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
United States Probation Office of the Eastern District of Tennessee, Lawson Burrow, Amber Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stock v. Grundy County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Alexander Raymond Stock
Defendant:
Grundy County, Tennessee, Grundy County Sheriffs Department, Heath Gunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Yishra'el v. Wilson et al
as 1:2019cv00292
Plaintiff:
Omar Qolayah Yishra'el
Defendant:
C Mullinix, Eric Diaz, Burlon Hayworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00366
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harwell et al v. City of Mount Juliet et al
as 3:2016cv02374
Plaintiff:
Heath Harwell and Edith Freeman
Defendant:
City of Mount Juliet and Ed Hagerty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White et al v. City of Chattanooga et al (JRG1)
as 1:2016cv00166
Plaintiff:
Charles White , Tami Boring White and Heath Brandon Lee White
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga , John Doe, 1 , John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parr et al v. Owen et al
as 2:2016cv02034
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Parr and David Heath Conrad
Defendant:
David S Owen, III and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
