Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Heath et al v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Heath and Anna Holliday
Defendant:
John Doe and U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hill v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Heath Taylor and Steve Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Johnson et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Lamar Hill
Defendant:
Steve Johnson, Dana Howell, Rick Chancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Conner
as 3:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Alicia Cooper
Defendant:
Heath Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ryles v. Logan et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2023cv00526
Plaintiff:
Sanford Leonard Ryles
Defendant:
Reginald Logan, Heath Taylor, William Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Southern Hospitality Group, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Christine Heath
Defendant:
Southern Hospitality Group, LLC, MY Hospitality Services, LLC, Yogesh Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Taylor et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2022cv00580
Plaintiff:
Jervis Jermaine Brown
Defendant:
Heath Taylor and Michael Schroeder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
