Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Baker v. Green
as 0:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Ashley Heath A Baker
Defendant:
Warden Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heath v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Robin Heath
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Heath v. Boom et al
as 3:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Chad-Alan Heath
Defendant:
District Judge Claria H. Boom and James J. Vilt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. White et al
as 7:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Heath Anthony Baker and Ashley N. Baker
Defendant:
UA White, Captain Taylor, Amy Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banning v. SSA
as 3:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Heath R. Banning and Heather R. Banning
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Baker v. Branham et al
as 7:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Heath Anthony Baker, Ashley, Anthony Heath Baker and others
Defendant:
Christy Branham, Kentucky Parole Board, Cookie Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Chandler et al
as 0:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ashley Heath A Baker, Anthony Baker, Ashley Heath Baker and others
Defendant:
Larry D. Chandler, Cookie Crews, Rhonda May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Spencer
as 3:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Chad-Alan: Heath
Defendant:
Dillon Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Heath v. Shumate et al
as 3:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Chad-Alan: Heath
Defendant:
Kimberly W. Shumate and John D. Simcoe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Heath v. McCoy
as 3:2022cv00449
Plaintiff:
Chad-Alan: Heath
Defendant:
Russell Dale McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
