Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Barb v. Heath Consultants, Inc
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
James Barb
Defendant:
Heath Consultants, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Ferguson v. Corbin et al
as 7:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
Lacy Ferguson
Defendant:
Clay Corbin, Patty Barr, Heath Custer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lipscomb v. Corbin et al
as 7:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lipscomb
Defendant:
Clay A. Corbin, Captain Tana Jones, LPN Kovak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doss v. Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2022cv00354
Petitioner:
Brian Heath Doss
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rogers v. United States
as 7:2021cv00525
Plaintiff:
Heath Rogers
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Crawford v. Creative Cost Control, Corporation
as 7:2021cv00419
Plaintiff:
Christian Heath Crawford
Defendant:
Creative Cost Control, Corporation doing business as SERVPRO of Roanoke, Montgomery, & Pulaski
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Renoir v. McDuffy et al
as 7:2021cv00394
Plaintiff:
Pierre A. Renoir and Stones
Defendant:
Dr. McDuffy, WRSP Mental Health Staff, WRSP Nursing Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keller v. USA
as 5:2021cv81475
Petitioner:
Nakia Heath Keller
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lipscomb v. Whitley et al
as 7:2020cv00411
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Lt. Derito, Capt. Heath Custer, Superintendant James F. Whitley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
