Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 780
The Burlington Insurance Company v. Milwhite, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff: The Burlington Insurance Company
Defendant: Milwhite, Inc., Ivan Garza, Genoveva Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Type: Contract Insurance
USA v. Paredes-Hinojosa
as 24-50319
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Rafael Paredes-Hinojosa
Havens v. Pearson et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff: Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant: Heather Pearson, Vanmetter, Stevenson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Hinojosa
as 24-50296
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Rafael Paredes Hinojosa, also known as Rafael Peredez-Hinojosa
Hinojosa et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2024cv00084
Plaintiff: Rosalinda Hinojosa and Homero Hinojosa, Jr.
Defendant: General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00593
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Depalma Hinojosa v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00670
Special Master: Randi Ellis
Plaintiff: Joseph Depalma Hinojosa
Defendant: Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Welsh v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00069
Plaintiff: Lonnie Kade Welsh
Defendant: Management and Training Corporation, Sergio Molina, Wayne Schmoker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Leonel Hinojosa, Jr.
as 24-1150
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: LEONEL MILLER HINOJOSA, JR.
Obryant v. Hinojosa
as 4:2024cv00365
Petitioner: Hightower O'Bryant and Hightower Obryant
Respondent: Rene Hinojosa and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?