Cases 1 - 10 of 281
Judon v. Bane
as 1:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Isaac Judon
Defendant:
Yesenia Bane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Brown v. Witt
as 5:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Pamela L. Brown
Defendant:
Isaac G. Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
NARANJO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
ISAAC NARANJO
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, PA ATT. GENERAL, PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00300
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
NARANJO v. COULEHAN et al
as 2:2023cv01983
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NARANJO
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER COULEHAN, HURD, WITTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Spathelf et al
as 3:2023cv01640
Plaintiff:
David Mark Wilson
Defendant:
Lawrence Spathelf, Leland Palmere, Isaac Troutman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Romain v. Kieselowsky et al
as 3:2023cv01526
Plaintiff:
Steven Romain
Defendant:
Matthew Kieselowsky, Dr. Dan Galvan, Jane Doe Nurse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malseed v. Penbrook Borough et al
as 1:2023cv01329
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Malseed
Defendant:
Penbrook Borough, Susquehanna Township, Dauphin County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liptok v. City of Pottsville, PA, et al
as 3:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
John J. Liptok
Defendant:
City Of Pottsville Pa., et al, City Council, Dorothy Botto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIPTOK v. CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL
as 2:2023cv02942
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. LIPTOK
Defendant:
CITY OF POTTSVILLE PA., ET AL, CITY COUNCIL, DOROTHY BOTTO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
