Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Jarvis v. Monte
as 4:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Karen Jarvis
Defendant:
Tom D. Monte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02281
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Jarvis v. Jarvis et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
William T Jarvis
Defendant:
Carolyn Jarvis, Michelle Shook, Robyn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hines v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01260
Plaintiff:
Richard Jarvis Hines
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Jarvis v. Iredell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
William T Jarvis
Defendant:
Iredell County Detention Center, Travis Ward, John Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bittle v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Charlotte Transportation Center, Unemployment North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JOY v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
JARVIS JOY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Bittle v. Go Tires Auto Repair
as 3:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
Go Tires Auto Repair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bittle v. North Carolina Division of Employment Security
as 3:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
North Carolina Division of Employment Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
