Cases 11 - 20 of 269
Wartley Jr #462928 v. Chapman et al
as 1:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
John D. Wartley Jr #462928
Defendant:
Willis Chapman, Jeffery Clouse, Jason Erway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferies v. Van Rooy Properties, Inc
as 5:2022cv13147
Plaintiff:
Damarkus Jefferies
Defendant:
Van Rooy Properties, Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Ryan v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv13002
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Healthcare, Inc. and others
Waller #424245 v. Burgess et al
as 1:2022cv00958
Plaintiff:
Jay Waller #424245
Defendant:
Michael Burgess, Thomas Parish, Jeffery Clouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Solomonson et al
as 2:2022cv12238
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Bryant
Defendant:
John R. Solomonson and Unknown Kakani
Addis #420015 v. Macauley
as 1:2022cv00879
Petitioner:
Andrew Jeffery Addis #420015
Respondent:
Matt Macauley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vorus #715289 v. Corizon Health Care et al
as 2:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Ira Vorus #715289
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care, Unknown Lewis, Jamie Monville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osborne #649938 v. Dunn
as 1:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Ryan Osborne #649938
Defendant:
Jeffery Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Worden et al
as 1:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
Keir Rashon Watson
Defendant:
Jeffery C. Worden, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. City of Detroit, a municipal corporation et al
as 2:2022cv10322
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Scott
Defendant:
City of Detroit, a municipal corporation, John Doe Officer I and John Does 2-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
