Cases 41 - 50 of 234
Jenkins v. Tony et al
as 7:2020cv01283
Defendant:
Officer Renolds, Alabama Department of Corrections, Warden Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Noble Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00621
Defendant:
Lt. McCovery, Monica McCoy, Captain Danzey and others
Plaintiff:
Tovorris Leshawn Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Crow et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00622
Defendant:
Joseph Danzey, Jennifer McCovery, John Crow and others
Plaintiff:
Duane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01141
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Ms. Bell and others
Petitioner:
Tanya L. English
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rudd v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00561
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility, Sgt. Thompkins, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Ray Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crinel v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01099
Respondent:
Mr. Lopez, Jenkins, Ms. Haywood and others
Petitioner:
Lisa A Crinel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hall v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv01065
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Issac, Jenkins and others
Petitioner:
Nakeisha Y Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jenkins v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2020cv00995
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Carla Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Meyers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2020cv00967
Respondent:
Chad Garrett, Jenkins, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Petitioner:
Julia Hollis Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller v. Johnson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00458
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Miller
Defendant:
CO Jenkins and Lt. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
