Cases 1 - 10 of 94
New York State Vegetable Growers Association Inc. et al v. Hochul et al
as 1:2023cv01044
Plaintiff:
New York State Vegetable Growers Association Inc., A & J Kirby Farms, LLc, Porpiglia Farms, Inc and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Hochul, Letitia James, John Wirenius and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Palisades Estates EOM, LLC et al v. County of Rockland, New York et al
as 7:2023cv04215
Plaintiff:
Palisades Estates EOM, LLC, Newburgh EOM LLC d/b/a Crossroads Hotel, Ratan Newburgh LLC d/b/a Ramada By Wyndham and others
Defendant:
County of Rockland, New York, Edwin J. Day, in his official capacity as County Executive of Rockland County,, Town of Orangetown, New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dj Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
Greater Chautauqua Federal Credit Union v. Quattrone
as 23-733
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Greater Chautauqua Federal Credit Union, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Boulevard Federal Credit Union, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Greater Niagara Federal Credit Union, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Appellant:
Western New York Law Center and Bartel Miller
Defendant:
Hon. Lawrence K. Marks, in his official capacity as Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts and Letitia James, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff James B. Quattrone, Sheriff John Garcia, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Erie County, New York and Sheriff Michael J. Filicetti, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Niagara County, New York
Severino v. Spagnola et al
as 3:2022cv01529
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dillon Severino and Dillon Severino
Defendant:
Fernando Spagnola, Ned Lamont, James Rovella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christian v. Nigrelli
as 22-2987
Plaintiff:
John Brown
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Brett Christian, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. and Second Amendment Foundation, Inc.
Defendant:
John J. Flynn, in his official capacity as District Attorney for the County of Erie, New York
Defendant / Appellant:
Steven A. Nigrelli, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the New York State Police
Hardaway, Jr. v. Nigrelli
as 22-2933
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jimmie Hardaway, Jr., Larry A. Boyd, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Brian D. Seaman, in his official capacity as District Attorney for the County of Niagara, New York and John J. Flynn, in his official capacity as District Attorney for the County of Erie, New York
Defendant / Appellant:
Steven A. Nigrelli, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the New York State Police
Hardaway, Jr. et al v. Nigrelli et al
as 1:2022cv00771
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Hardaway, Jr., Larry A Boyd, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Superintendent Kevin P. Bruen, District Attorney Brian D. Seaman, District Attorney John J. Flynn and others
Amicus Curiae:
Everytown for Gun Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bleuer, et al v. Nigrelli, et al
as 3:2022cv01037
Plaintiff:
Rev. Justin Bleuer, Berean Bible Church, New Yorkers for Constitutional Freedoms and others
Defendant:
Kevin P. Bruen, Michael Korchak, Lori Pettit Riemann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Suffolk County Police Benevolent Association et al v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2022cv05803
Plaintiff:
Suffolk County Police Benevolent Association and Noel DiGerolamo
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, The Suffolk County Board of Ethics, Eric A. Kopp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Christian et al v. Nigrelli et al
as 1:2022cv00695
Plaintiff:
John Boron, Brett Christian, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kevin P. Bruen, John J. Flynn, Steven A. Nigrelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
