Cases 11 - 20 of 133
Tony Neely v. Lepe
as 2:2022cv02969
Petitioner:
Tony Neely and Tony Curruthers
Respondent:
Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Guernsey v. Elko Wire Rope Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01674
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Guernsey
Defendant:
Elko Wire Rope Incorporated, Elko Wire Rope of Arizona LLC and Neely Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Neely v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv06452
Plaintiff:
Liam Neely
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guernsey v. Elko Wire Rope Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00848
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Guernsey
Defendant:
Elko Wire Rope of Arizona LLC, Elko Wire Rope Incorporated and Neely Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Penwell v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00547
Defendant:
Ronald T Bowers, Washington State Reformatory, Washington State Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Penwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neely v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv01228
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Katelyn Amanda Neely
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Neely v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv05611
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Neely
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
William Neely v. Patrick Covello, et al
as 20-15223
Respondent / Appellee:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PATRICK COVELLO and SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM S. NEELY
(PC) Felder v. Lizarraga et al
as 2:2020cv00266
Defendant:
B. Holmes, H. Macias, J. Ebeling and others
Plaintiff:
Freeman Allen Felder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv08228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
