Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dietz v. Fink et al
as 4:2023cv04158
Plaintiff:
Zachary Carson Dietz
Defendant:
Kolin Fink, Katie Johnson, Sam Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Rasmussen v. State of South Dakota
as 3:2022cv03021
Plaintiff:
Wyatt W. Rasmussen
Defendant:
State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Rasmussen v. Swanson
as 3:2022cv03016
Plaintiff:
Janet Lee Rasmussen
Defendant:
Charles Greg Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Shibly v. Rasmussen et al
as 4:2022cv04008
Plaintiff:
Adnan Ramadan Shibly
Defendant:
Rachel Rasmussen, Amanda Eden, James A. Billon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rasmussen v. Baxter et al
as 3:2021cv03021
Plaintiff:
Wyatt W. Rasmussen
Defendant:
Dustin Baxter, Brandon Fleagle, Guy DiBenedetto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ludens v. Gilbertson et al
as 5:2020cv05027
Defendant:
Judge Susan M. Sabers, Reed Rasmussen, Judge Jane Wipf Pfeifle and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary D. Ludens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Orrock et al
as 5:2018cv05049
Defendant:
Jason Fanning, Jeff Slattery, City of Martin, South Dakota and others
Plaintiff:
Britt T. Long
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
County of Bennett, South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Telford v. Bradeen et al
as 5:2017cv05042
Plaintiff:
Holli Telford
Defendant:
Ron A. Bradeen, Bradeen Real Estate, Jeff Storm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rasmussen et al v. IMT Insurance Company
as 4:2017cv04056
Plaintiff:
Robert Rasmussen and Diane Rasmussen
Defendant:
IMT Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv04129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
