Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,648
Rudzik et al v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00790
Plaintiff: Robert J. Rudzik and Carol Ann Rudzik
Defendant: Forest River Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
SMITH v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv01666
Defendant: DANIELL, OLUREMI KOLADE, EMERSON and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT LAMONT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNER v. GRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01664
Plaintiff: ROBERT D. CONNER
Defendant: FULFORD, BODOE, CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOUTCH v. MONTGOMERY
as 2:2024cv00376
Plaintiff: ROBERT LESLIE FOUTCH
Defendant: PHELAN JAMES MONTGOMERY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CONNER v. FUNDERSOL et al
as 1:2024cv01614
Defendant: COTTON, JOANNA PRIMEAU, WINGARD and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT CONNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUMMERS v. FOSTER et al
as 1:2024cv01615
Plaintiff: ROBERT C. SUMMERS, III
Defendant: JACKSON, FOSTER, COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fortman v. Hershberger et al
as 1:2024cv00389
Defendant: Darrin Hatin and Troy Hershberger
Plaintiff: Robert P Fortman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF CARMEL POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2024cv01600
Defendant: JAMES SEMESTER, ESTEBAN NAVARRETTE, GARRETT DURKAC and others
Plaintiff: SOLOMON WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01583
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOPPER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv01225
Defendant: CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, ROBERT ALDRICH, CANDACE ASHBY and others
Plaintiff: MATTHEW HOPPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?