Cases 31 - 40 of 9,682
Elias Mejia Rodriguez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1329
Petitioner:
ELIAS ISMAEL MEJIA RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
RODRIGUEZ v. USA
as 1:2024cv00642
Plaintiff:
SUZETTE GRACE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Cestaro v. Rodriguez
as 24-973
Plaintiff:
R. MICHAEL CESTARO
Defendant:
CLARISSA M. RODRIGUEZ, Chair, New York State Workers' Compensation Board, in her individual and official capacity, DAVID WERTHEIM, Former Acting Executive director and Former General Counsel, New York State Workers' Compensation Board, in his individual and official capacity, HEATHER MACMASTER, Acting General Counsel, New York State Workers' Compensation Board, in her individual and Official Capacity and others
Yichen Lin v. Leon Rodriguez et al
as 2:2024cv03024
Plaintiff:
Yichen Lin
Defendant:
Leon Rodriguez, Laura Zuchowski and Mark Hazuda
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Franco Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2305
Petitioner:
EDER JOSUE FRANCO RODRIGUEZ, ANA YADIRA VALENCIA OCHOA and NICOLE FRANCO VALENCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
United States of America v. Echevarria (Simmons)
as 24-938
Defendant:
NAQUANN SIMMONS, TJON MACOLL, ANDREW ECHEVARRIA and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Duarte Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-929
Petitioner:
SONIA YULIETH DUARTE RODRIGUEZ, DIEGO STEVEN LOPEZ MORENO, ANDRES ESTEBAN LOPEZ DUARTE and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
