Cases 61 - 70 of 39,802
Rodriguez-Lara v. Garland
as 24-2569
Petitioner:
SEGUNDO PASTOR RODRIGUEZ-LARA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bravo, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2602
Plaintiff:
GLORIA DELIA BRAVO and DALILA RODRIGUEZ CUEVAS
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Rodriguez-Merida, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2597
Petitioner:
GEINER YESICA RODRIGUEZ-MERIDA and BELLALETH ISAYDI VASQUEZ-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Snipes v. Olson et al
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Traymonte B. Snipes
Defendant:
Olson, C. Duenos, Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alatan v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv01509
Plaintiff:
Olotin Alfred Alatan
Defendant:
United States of America, Gus Saper and Lourdes Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
(PC) Rodriguez v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rodriguez
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathan Carroll v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc.
as 24-1354
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. CARROLL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, GERALDINE P. CORRIGAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRYSTAL A. BATEMAN and others
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Aberdeen Barn Steakhouse
Rodriguez v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Abraham Salomon Rodriguez
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Talavera v. 987 Supermarket Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03089
Plaintiff:
Fulgencio Talavera
Defendant:
987 Supermarket Inc., Rafael A. Guzman and Roman Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
