Cases 1 - 10 of 815
Xiquin Xirum, et al v. Garland
as 24-1413
Petitioner:
JACINTO XIQUIN XIRUM and BARTOLA ROMERO SANTOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Santos-Ramos v. Garland
as 24-1396
Petitioner:
JUNNIOR ALEXANDER SANTOS-RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Almeida et al v. Taxiarchos et al
as 1:2024cv10408
Plaintiff:
Debra Almeida and Joseph J Santos
Defendant:
John Taxiarchos, Rose Renee Fernandes, City of New Bedford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office, et al
as 24-1038
Plaintiff:
EVANS EMONS STROMAN
Defendant:
BRISTOL COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NEW BEDFORD DISTRICT COURT and others
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office, et al
as 23-2061
Plaintiff:
EVANS EMONS STROMAN
Defendant:
BRISTOL COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NEW BEDFORD DISTRICT COURT and others
Hernandez Malave v. C.O. Moson et al
as 1:2023cv00524
Plaintiff:
Oneil Hernandez Malave
Defendant:
C.O. Moson, C.O. Peixoto, Lt. McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vieira Santos, et al v. Garland
as 23-2013
Petitioner:
MARYANGELA VIEIRA SANTOS and D.L.V.D.L.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Dos-Reis, et al v. Garland
as 23-1981
Petitioner:
DEVANI DOS-REIS, IVANETE FERREIRA DOS SANTOS-REIS, L.F.D.S.R. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Board of Directors of Round Hill Community Corporation v. Santos et al
as 1:2023cv12802
Plaintiff:
Board of Directors of Round Hill Community Corporation
Defendant:
Kevin C. Santos, Jon E. Cohen and Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service,
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Santos-Camacho v. US
as 23-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN BARTOLOME SANTOS-CAMACHO
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Interested Party:
LEWIS N. JACK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
