Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Merrick B. Garland v. Rony Soto Santos
as 24-1733
Petitioner:
Rony Alfredo Soto Santos
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Dos Santos v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Denisson Tiago Amaral Dos Santos
Defendant:
US Department of Homeland Security, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Connie Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States v. Amado Correa-Santos
as 24-1306
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Amado Correa-Santos
Garcia Sanchez et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al
as 4:2023cv03102
Plaintiff:
Mario Joel Garcia Sanchez, Antonio Beatriz Cortes, Josue Heriberto Rivas Santos and others
Defendant:
USCIS Nebraska Service Center, Ur M. Jaddou and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Santos Rosales-Martinez v. State of Iowa
as 23-1679
Petitioner:
Santos Rosales-Martinez
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Santos Perez
as 22-3577
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Santos Gomez Perez
United States v. Luis Castro-Santos
as 22-3493
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Luis Alberto Castro-Santos
Santos Munguia v. Merrick B. Garland
as 21-2843
Petitioner:
Santos Jeovany Munguia
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Alvaro Alvarenga-Santos, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2655
Petitioner:
Alvaro Antonio Alvarenga-Santos, Maria Pleitez-De Alvarenga, A.A.A.P. and others
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
