Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Orellana-Hernandez v. F C I Oakdale II
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Santos Orellana-Hernandez
Defendant:
F C I Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Orellana-Hernandez v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Santos Orellana-Hernandez
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LaPoint et al v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Co et al
as 2:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Mason LaPoint and Constance Lapoint
Defendant:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Co, American Integrated Services Inc and Santos Tomas Sanjuan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Santos v. United Services Automobile Association
as 2:2022cv04010
Plaintiff:
Noreen Santos
Defendant:
United Services Automobile Association
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Brisco v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
as 2:2022cv02340
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Plaintiff:
Violeta Santos Brisco
Defendant:
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Dardar v. LeBlanc et al
as 1:2021cv02284
Plaintiff:
Santos Dardar
Defendant:
James LeBlanc and Marcus Myer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Netro et al v. Amerifield Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv01082
Defendant:
Amerifield Inc, Trisura Specialty Insurance Co and David Payne
Plaintiff:
Jesus Netro and Ana Marlene Figueroa-Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00619
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Santos v. USA
as 1:2019cv01133
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Cristina Daniela Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00878
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
