Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Wilhite v. Expensify, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01784
Plaintiff:
Cody Wilhite
Defendant:
Expensify, Inc., David Barrett, Ryan Schaffer and others
In re Manufactured Home Lot Rents Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2023cv14571
Plaintiff:
Georgia Moffat, Lee Ann Schaffer and Barb Rowley
Defendant:
Datacomp Appraisal Systems, Inc., Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc., Hometown America Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Schaffer et al v. The Johns Hopkins University
as MD/1:23-CV-02099
Plaintiff:
Schaffer
Defendant:
The Johns Hopkins University
O'Connor v. Snyder et al
as 1:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Janis O'Connor
Defendant:
Elmer A. Snyder, Lori Snyder, A&L Enterprises, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as DE/1:22-CV-00848
Plaintiff:
Jones, Morganne Mease, Trenashia Jones and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Lollar v. Panbela Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03045
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lollar
Defendant:
Panbela Therapeutics, Inc., Michael T. Cullen, Jennifer K. Simpson and others
Schaffer v. 2:20 Marketing Group
as 4:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Maria Schaffer
Defendant:
2:20 Marketing Group a Nevada limited liability company doing business as Xurli
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-2440
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Osbaldo Berrios v. Dino Flores
as 21-6856
Defendant / Appellee:
SCHAFFER, BLACK & FLORES, P.C. and DINO E. FLORES, Esq.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OSBALDO LEMUS BERRIOS
SCHAFFER et al v. PARKER et al
as 2:2021cv02171
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND SCHAFFER, SCHAFFER ENTERPRISES LLC, ROODLY AIME and others
Defendant:
REHAB QUEEN OHIO LLC, PARKER PROPERTIES UNLIMITED LLC, G PARKER UNLIMITED LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
