Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Schultz v. Horseshoe Hammond LLC
as 2:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Robert Schultz
Defendant:
Horseshoe Hammond LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Schultz et al v. Jayco, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
George Schultz and Susan Schultz
Defendant:
Jayco, Inc. and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 w Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
HMUNG v. SCHENCK et al
as 1:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HMUNG and NGUN HMUNG
Defendant:
OFFICER SCHENCK, LIEUTENANT JAMES PRIOR, SARGENT BANDY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
HARNEY v. SCHULTZ et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
MELVIN WES HARNEY
Defendant:
ZACHARY SCHULTZ, GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, CHARLES F. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HILLS v. MILLER et al
as 2:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
SCOTTY ROY HILLS
Defendant:
MILLER, BISHOP, MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARNEY v. SCHULTZ et al
as 2:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
MELVIN WES HARNEY
Defendant:
ZACHARY SCHULTZ, CHARLES F. MILLER, MIA E. KELSAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schultz v. Neal et al
as 3:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
Brian Schultz, Brian Schulz and Brian Lee Schultz
Defendant:
Ron Neal and Correctional Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
