Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Reinke v. Ternus et al
as 3:2024cv05398
Plaintiff:
Brian Reinke
Defendant:
Rob Ternus, Michael Erenfelt, Darrell Benton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv05050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Elizabeth v. Benton et al
as 4:2024cv05001
Plaintiff:
Sherry Elizabeth
Defendant:
County of Benton and Benton County Emergency Services
Dammarell v. Coyote Ridge et al
as 1:2023cv03175
Petitioner:
Travis Lee Dammarell
Respondent:
Coyote Ridge, Benton County and Yakima County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dammarell v. Coyote Ridge Correction et al
as 1:2023cv03146
Plaintiff:
Travis Lee Dammarell
Defendant:
Coyote Ridge Correction, Benton County Work Release, Benton County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Benton County et al
as 2:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
County of Benton, NaphCare Inc and Eastern State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fox v. County of Benton
as 4:2023cv05099
Plaintiff:
John C Fox and Christopher Simpson Fox
Defendant:
County of Benton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ragland v. Bennett
as 3:2023cv05574
Petitioner:
John Benton Ragland
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Agli v. Benton County Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv05050
Plaintiff:
Robert Silvio Agli
Defendant:
Benton County Corrections, Wayne and Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. US Distrect Attorneys Office et al
as 4:2023cv05001
Plaintiff:
Elvis Camilo Renteria Lopez, Elvis Lopez and Elvis Camillo Renteria Lopez
Defendant:
US Distrect Attorneys Office and Benton County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
