Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02382
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gye-Jacquot v. King et al
as 6:2026cv00141
Defendant:
Ryan P. Hayes and Britten Renee King
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gye-Jacquot
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03319
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00861
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00858
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv03277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DE ARMAS ARTILES v. STULZ et al
as 1:2026cv27385
Plaintiff:
Geidy DE ARMAS ARTILES
Defendant:
Director ENID STULZ, Director of NBC Leslie Britten, District Director Linda Swacina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DE ARMAS ARTILES v. STULZ et al
as 1:2026cv27395
Plaintiff:
Geidy DE ARMAS ARTILES
Defendant:
Director ENID STULZ, Director of NBC Leslie Britten, District Director Linda Swacina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
