Cases 1 - 10 of 73
USA v. Coffey
as 23-30652
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Donald Coffey
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Saddleback Exploration, LLC v. Brunelle et al
as 4:2023cv03091
Plaintiff:
Saddleback Exploration, LLC
Defendant:
Barbara Brunelle, Allen P. Wherry Revocable Trust, Betty Coole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Gill v. Alexander
as 23-10843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rudolfo Gill
Defendant / Appellee:
Wade Alexander, Jordan Unit Assistant Warden, Antonious Flanagan, Captain, Carlos Mendoza, Lieutenant and others
Gilliard v. Groesbeck Police Dept
as 23-50457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adrian Gilliard
Defendant / Appellee:
Groesbeck Police Department, Chris Henson, John Blanco and others
Gilliard v. Groesbeck Police Department et al
as 6:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Adrian Gilliard
Defendant:
Groesbeck Police Department, Chris Henson, John Blanco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drain v. Coffey et al
as 5:2022cv05784
Plaintiff:
Mattie P. Drain and Mattie P Drain
Defendant:
Eric X. Coffey, Makada Transport, Inc., Carolina Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Coffey v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00984
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Coffey
Defendant:
Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00739
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jethro v. Baywood Apartments, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jethro
Defendant:
Multifamily Management, Inc., PC Baywood, LLC, Patrick J. Coffey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
