Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Nykiel et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv12247
Plaintiff:
Annemari Cooley and Daniel Nykiel
Defendant:
Board of Directors of Smith & Nephew, Inc.., Smith & Nephew Inc. and US Pension and Benefits Executive Committee of Smith & Nephew, Inc..
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Harding v. Cooley
as 1:2024cv10936
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Allison Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bremner v. Unum Group et al
as 3:2022cv10729
Plaintiff:
George Bremner
Defendant:
Unum Group, Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Cooley, LLP Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bremner v. Unum Group et al
as 1:2022cv10729
Plaintiff:
George Bremner
Defendant:
Unum Group, Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Cooley, LLP Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Cooley v. Southwest Airlines Company
as 3:2021cv30001
Plaintiff:
Jessie Cooley
Defendant:
Southwest Airlines Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newman v. Cooley Dickinson Hospital
as 3:2018cv30169
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Newman
Defendant:
Cooley Dickinson Hospital
Cooley v. Gaffney
as 1:2018cv10258
Petitioner:
Edward Cooley
Respondent:
Erin Gaffney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union et al v. MBTA
as 1:2016cv12486
Plaintiff:
Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union , John Mooneyhan , Shara Daniels and others
Defendant:
MBTA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv30186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Cooley et al v. New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv10567
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Cooley and Robert Cooley
Defendant:
New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. and Barry J. Cadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
