Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Cullum v. Grell et al
as 3:2023cv03018
Plaintiff:
Jacob Monroe Cullum and Jake Cullum
Defendant:
Dalton Grell and Matt Dale Klunder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Talkington, et al
as 3:2022cv00022
Defendant:
Johnnie Campbell, Korie Talkington and Christine Dalton Ploof
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dukes v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00070
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Dalton Lee Dukes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tennant et al v. Featherstone et al
as 3:2019cv00077
Defendant:
Mark Cady, Brent Appel, Paul Macek and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tennant, Kenneth Tennant, Kenneth C. Tennant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Banks v. Foxhoven et al
as 4:2018cv00201
Plaintiff:
James Edward Banks
Defendant:
Jerry Foxhoven , Carrie Lair , Anne Schlepphorst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Chamjock et al
as 6:2018cv02020
Plaintiff:
Dalton D Jones, Jr
Defendant:
Gatbel Chamjock , Nyamission Jock , Kelli Ferkovich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson et al v. Roehl Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Joan Peterson and Kevin Peterson
Defendant:
Roehl Transport Inc and Dalton Langerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wessel et al v. Mapes et al
as 4:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wayne Wessel, Isaac Lopez Facio, Quentin Samson Washington and others
Defendant:
Terry Mapes, Theresa Sparks, Kristian Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00172
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Tennant v. Anderson et al
as 3:2010cv00144
Plaintiff:
Kenneth C Tennant
Defendant:
Clifford Anderson, Davenport Police Department, Brian Heyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
